بررسی تأثیر یکپارچگی رفتاری تیم مدیریت ارشد و دوسوتوانی سازمانی بر عملکرد

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه گیلان

2 انشگاه گیلان

چکیده

تیم‌های مدیریت ارشد سازمان‌ها به عنوان تصمیم‌گیرندگان اصلی شرکت‌ها نقش اصلی در ایجاد دوسوتوانی سازمانی ایفا می‌کنند. یکپارچگی رفتاری تیم مدیریت ارشد که بیانگر تعاملات جمعی اعضای تیم مدیریت ارشد است، حرکت سازمان‌ها به سمت دوسوتوانی و به دست آوردن عملکرد بهتر را تسهیل می‌کند. در این مقاله، تأثیر یکپارچگی رفتاری تیم مدیریت ارشد بر عملکرد شرکت‌های تولیدی بررسی‌شده و همچنین نقش میانجی دوسوتوانی سازمانی به عنوان قابلیت سازمان‌ها در بهره‌برداری و اکتشاف فرصت‌های رشد، در رابطه بین یکپارچگی رفتاری تیم مدیریت ارشد و عملکرد مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. داده‌های پژوهش از شرکت‌های تولیدی شهر صنعتی رشت گردآوری شده است. روش پژوهش، توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی بوده که اطلاعات از طریق پرسش‌نامه جمع‌آوری شده و برای تحلیل داده‌ها از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و الگوریتم حداقل مربعات جزئی استفاده شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که یکپارچگی رفتاری تیم مدیریت ارشد با میانجی‌گری دوسوتوانی سازمانی بر روی عملکرد تأثیرگذار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


پور عبادالهیان کویچ، محسن؛ صمدزاد، سعیده  و وفائی، الهام (1389)، بررسی الگوی ساختار، رفتار و عملکرد بازار: مطالعه موردی صنایع چرم، کیف و کفش ایران، مجله علمی پژوهشی سیاست‌گذاری اقتصادی،(3)2، 19-1.

خداداد حسینی، حمید؛ فتحی، سعید و الهی، شعبان (1385)، طراحی الگوی تأثیر فناوری اطلاعات بر سنجه‌های عملکرد مالی با رویکرد فرا تحلیل، بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، شماره 46، 83-61.

داوری، علی و رضازاده، آرش (1392)، مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با نرم‌افزار PLS، تهران: سازمان انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.

Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. (2001). Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 645-663.

Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability—rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of marketing, 69(4), 61-83.

Baker T. Hunt T.& Hawes J. (1999). Marketing strategy and organizational culture. Journal of Marketing Management, 9(2), 32–46.

Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology studies, 2(2), 285-309.

Beckman, C. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 741-758.

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of management review, 28(2), 238-256.

BolíVar-Ramos, M. T., GarcíA-Morales, V. J., & GarcíA-SáNchez, E. (2012). Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: Effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 331-357.

Bourgeois, L. J. (1980). Performance and consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 1(3), 227-248.

Burgers, H., & Jansen, J. J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity and corporate entrepreneurship: The differential effects on venturing, innovation and renewal processes. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 28(19), 2.

Carmeli, A. (2008). Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations. Group & Organization Management,33(6), 712-735.

Carmeli, A., & Halevi, M. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207-218.

Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). It's all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance.Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351-386.

Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. New York: Wiley.

Devinney Timothy M., Pierre J. Richard, George S. Yip, Gerry Johnson, (2004). Measuring Organizational Performance in Management Research: A Synthesis of Measurement Challenges and Approaches. Australian Graduate School of Management,Presented in AOM Conference.

Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434-449.

Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The management of organization, 1, 167-188.

Edmondson, A. C., Roberto, M. A., & Watkins, M. D. (2003). A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: Managing unstructured task streams.The Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 297-325.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making.Strategic management journal, 13(S2), 17-37.

Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50. 

Geerts, A., Blindenbach-Driessen, F., & Gemmel, P.(2010). Achieving a balance between exploration and exploitation in service firms: A Longitudinal study. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, 1, 1-6.

Ghemawat, P., & Ricart Costa, J. E. (1993). The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 59-73.

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.

Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label. Research in organizational behavior, 16, 171-214.

Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Corporate coherence and the top management team.Strategy & Leadership, 25(5), 24-29.

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206.

He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, 15(4), 481-494.

Holmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization science, 15(1), 70-81.

Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.

Jansen, J. J., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 982-1007.

Junni, P,. Sarala, R., & Taras, V. Tarba, S. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity an  Performance: A Meta- Analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312.

Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., Fotiadis, T. A., & Zeriti, A. (2013). Resources and capabilities as drivers of hotel environmental marketing strategy: Implications for competitive advantage and performance. Tourism Management, 35, 94-110.

Li, C. R. (2013). How top management team diversity fosters organizational ambidexterity: The role of social capital among top executives. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(5), 874-896.

Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2002). Founding team comprehension and behavioral integration: Evidence from new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management, Best Paper Proceedings, 1-6.

Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 794-813.

Lin, Z., Yang, H., & Demirkan, I. (2007). The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing. Management Science, 53(10), 1645-1658.

Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of management, 32(5), 646-672.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.

Michel, J. G., & Hambrick, D. C. (1992). Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 9-37.

Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis. Trust in Organizations. Frontiers of theory and research, 261-287.

Mooney, A.C., & Sonnenfeld, J. (2001). Exploring antecedents to conflict during strategic decision making: The importance of behavioral integration. A paper presented in the Academy of Management Meeting, BPS Division.

Neokosmidi, Z. V. (2005). Advertising, Market Share, and Profitability in the Greek Consumer Industry. Journal of Business & Economics Research,3(9), 69-76.

O'Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative science quarterly,34, 21-37.

O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization.Harvard business review82(4), 74-83.

Ou, A.,Y., Tsui ,A.,S., Kinicki, A., J., Waldman, D., A., Xiao., Z., Jiwen Song, L. (2014).  Humble Chief Executive Officers’ Connections to Top Management Team Integration and Middle Managers’ Responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 34-72.

Prieto, I. M., & Pilar Pérez Santana, M. (2012). Building ambidexterity: The role of human resource practices in the performance of firms from Spain. Human Resource Management, 51(2), 189-211.

Siegel, P. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Business strategy and the social psychology of top management teams. Advances in strategic management, 13, 91-119.

Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864-894.

Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O'Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412−438.

 

Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization science, 16(5), 522-536.

Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposite Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modeling, In Proceedings of the XLII SIS scientific meeting, 1, 739-742.

Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.

Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1997). Winning through innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A., (1996), Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, California Management Review, 38 (4), 8−30.

Van Looy, B., Martens, T., & Debackere, K. (2005). Organizing for continuous innovation: On the sustainability of ambidextrous organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(3), 208-221.

Venkatraman, N., Lee, C. H., & Iyer, B. (2007). Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector, unpublished manuscript (earlier version presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, 2005). Boston: Boston University.

Vorhies D.W. MorganR.E.& AutryC.W. (2009). Product-market strategy and the marketing capabilities of the firm: impact on market effectiveness and cash flow performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30,1310–1334.

West, C. T. J., & Schwenk, C. R. (1996). Top management team strategic consensus, demographic homogeneity and firm performance: A report of resounding nonfindings. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 571−576.

Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 33(1), 177-196.

Yang, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Ambidexterity in product innovation management: the direct and contingent effects on product development performance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA.