Designing a Model for Professional Behavior of Managers Facing Organizational Rip Currents Using Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor of Management of Payame Noor University

2 Payame Noor University employee

Abstract

Organizational rip currents are a phenomenon that affects epidemic state management and the pillars of all government agencies. But the behavior of corporate managers can be effective in modifying this phenomenon. Therefore, considering the importance of managers' behavior in organizational rip currents control, this study was conducted with the aim of designing a model of professional behavior for managers facing organizational rip currents at Payame Noor University. In this study, seven categories of variables affecting the behavior of managers were identified through a comprehensive research literature review as well as the use of experts’ opinions. Then, using the Interpretative Structural Modeling (ISM) technique and a questionnaire, the variables were classified into five levels. Later, after determining the levels of each factors and also considering the final accessibility matrix, the final model of the interpretation structure was drawn. Based on the results of this study, variables such as ethics and managerial expertise and the changing environment of the organization are among the factors that have the most impact on the professional behavior of managers in dealing with organizational rip currents.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 
Anthony, J. D. (2007). Critical Perceptions of Organizational Change. Journal of Change Management, 7, 231-242.
Attri, R. Grover, S., Dev, N. & Kumar, D. (2012). Anism Approach for Modeling the Enablers in the Implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TMP). International Journal System Assurance Engineering and Management, DOI:10.1007/s13198- 012-0088-7.
Carrol, A. B. (2004). The Four Faces of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100(1), 1-7.
Charan, P., Shanka, R. & Baisy, R. (2008). Analysis of Interactions Among the Variables of Supply Chain Performance Measurement System Implementation. Business Process Management, 14(4), 512-529.
Cherry, A. A. (2000). Tasting the Effects of Social Accounting Information on Decision Making and Attitudes: A Laboratory Experiment. University of California- Los Angeles.
Cho, S. (2006). The Power of Public Relations in Media Relations: A, National Survey of Health Practitioners. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(3), 563-580.
Drea, J. T., Bruner, G. C. & Hensel, P. J. (1993). Comparing Alternative Measures of the French and Raven Power Bases. The Journal of Personal Selling, Sales Management, 13(4), 73-80.
Hinkin, T. R. & Schrieshiem, C. A. (1989). Development and Application of New Scales to Measure the French and Ravan Bases of Social Power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 561-567.
Mandal, A. & Deshmukh, S. G. (1994). Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM). International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(6), 52-59.
O'Dwyer, B. (2009). Stakeholder Democracy- Challenges and Contributions from Social Accounting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1), 28-41.
Ravi, V. & Shankar, R. (2005). Analysis of Interactions Among the Barriers of Reverse logistics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, 1011-1029.
Sanuders, M. N. K., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2003). Research Methods for Business Students (3rd Ed). Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.
Saxena, J. P., Dushia, S. & Vrat, P. (1992). Scenario Building: A Critical Study of Energy Conservation in the Indian Cement Industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 41(2), 121-146.
 
Sharma, H. D., Gupta, A. D. & Sushil, B. (1995). The Objectives of Waste Management in India; A future Inquiry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 48, 258-309.
Takkar, J., Kanda, A. & Deshmokh, S. G. (2008). Evaluation of Buy Supplier Relationships Using an Integrated Mathematical Approach of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Graph Theoretic Approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 19(1), 92-124.