Designing the Illusion Model of Organizational Conspiracy by Grounded Theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 lu univ

2 lu

3 Management Ph.D, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to design a model for the illusion of organizational conspiracy through grounded theory. The present research is a qualitative research based on grounded theory. Therefore, in the qualitative approach, in the first phase, using a deep semi-structured interview, a dialogue was conducted with experts in this field. In the next step, the grounded method, which included open coding, axial coding and selective coding was used and the factors of non-existence meritocracy, inefficient performance, task-oriented leadership, and the structure of authority and lack of managerial suitability are identified as the causes of the illusory of conspiracy among executives in the organization. Extracted concepts as the core category were explained the concept of the illusion of conspiracy of managers. The categories of activities and political corruption, weak culture, anomalies, and instability are extracted as the contextual factors of the illusions of the conspiracy. The intervening factor is efficiency of organizational communication. The categories of organizational culture enhancement, organizational transparency, participatory leadership style and organizational merit strategy were identified as effective strategies against the illusions of organizational managers’ conspiracy which their consequences were effective organization, strong culture and effective manager and the consequences of its failure are inefficient organization, ineffective manager and weak culture.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 
Abalakina‐Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T. & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637-647.
Barron, D., Morgan, K., Towell, T., Altemeyer, B. & Swami, V. (2014). Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 156-159.
Berinsky, A. J. (2015). Rumors and health care reform: experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241-262.
Clarke, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32(2), 131-150.
Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M. & de Zavala, A. G. (2016). Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self-esteem, and the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 157-166.
Douglas, K. M. & Leite, A. C. (2016). Suspicion in the workplace: Organizational conspiracy theories and work‐related outcomes. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 486-506.
Douglas, K. M. & Sutton, R. M. (2011). Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 544-552.
Fenigstein, A. & Vanable, P. A. (1992). Paranoia and self-consciousness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 62(1), 138-129
Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. Sage.
Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 731-742.
Grimes, D. R. (2016). On the viability of conspiratorial beliefs. PloS one, 11(1), e0147905.
Grzesiak-Feldman, M. (2015). Are the high authoritarians more prone to adopt conspiracy theories? In Bilewicz, M., Cichocka, A. & Soral, W. (Eds.), The Psychology of conspiracy, pp: 99 –117, New York, NY: Routledge.
Jolley, D. & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 35-56.
LeBoeuf, R. A. & Norton, M. I. (2011). Consequence-cause matching: Looking to the consequences of events to infer their causes. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 128-141.
Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic change, 77(1-2), 45-72.
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E. & Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PloS one, 8(10), e75637.
McCauley, C. & Jacques, S. (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(5), 637.
McCauley, C. & Jacques, S. (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(5), 637.
Moulding, R., Nix-Carnell, S., Schnabel, A., Nedeljkovic, M., Burnside, E. E., Lentini, A. F. & Mehzabin, N. (2016). Better the devil you know than a world you don't? Intolerance of uncertainty and worldview explanations for belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and individual differences, 98, 345-354.
Oliver, J. E. & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style (s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952-966.
Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological bulletin, 136(2), 257.
Sharp, D. (2008). Advances in conspiracy theory. The Lancet, 372(9647), 1371-1372.
Stempel, C., Hargrove, T. & Stempel III, G. H. (2007). Media use, social structure, and belief in 9/11 conspiracy theories. Jstempelournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 353-372.
Straus, A. & Corbin, J. (2008). “Basic of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for developing Grounded Theory”. Third Edition, Los Angeles: stage publication, pp: 156.
Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J. & Rothschild, Z. K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 434.
Sunstein, C. R. & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202-227.
Swami, V. & Coles, R. (2010). The truth is out there: Belief in conspiracy theories. The Psychologist, 23(7), 560-563
Swami, V., Chamorro‐Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 749-761.
Swami, V., Furnham, A., Smyth, N., Weis, L., Lay, A. & Clow, A. (2016). Putting the stress on conspiracy theories: Examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 72-76.
Schreven, S. (2018). Conspiracy Theorists and Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 39(10), 1473-1488.
Uscinski, J. E. (2017). The Study of Conspiracy Theories. Argumenta, 1-13.
Van der Linden, S. (2013). What a hoax: Why people believe in conspiracy theories. Scientific American Mind, 24(4), 41 –43.
Van Prooijen, J. W. & de Vries, R. E. (2015). Organizational conspiracy beliefs: Implications for leadership styles and employee outcomes. Journal of business and psychology, 31(4), 479-491.
Van Prooijen, J. W. & Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 109-115.
 
Van Prooijen, J. W. & Van Dijk, E. (2014). When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 63-73.
Whitson, J. A. & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322(5898), 115-117.
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M. & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767-773.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics